Performativity and Theatricality in Palaiologan Iconography: The Composition of the Temptations of Christ in the Chora Monastery

  Zarras, Nektarios. 2025. “Performativity and Theatricality in Palaiologan Iconography: The Composition of the Temptations of Christ in the Chora Monastery.” In “Performance and Performativity in Late Antiquity and Byzantium,” ed. Niki Tsironi, special issue, Classics@ 24. https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HLNC.ESSAY:104135623.



The anthropocentric character of Byzantine art was, through the centuries,* a fixed reference point and a link between this art and most of the cultural manifestations of Medieval man. [1] Emotion and motion, these two dominant trends in the visual arts, which were expressed most exuberantly in Palaiologan times, were to create compositions that are unrivalled in their performativity and theatricality. [2] The reason for this artistic aspect of religious painting is that in this period narrativity, one of the most important currents in Late Byzantine art, reached its climax. Consequently, a basic prerequisite for understanding Byzantine performativity in art is narrativity, which consists in the detailed rendering of the Gospel narration to such a degree that even a single phrase or line can be a source of inspiration for creating a representation.

This dense recounting of events through small episodes which are enacted in a narrow spatial-temporal frame, can be classed in two basic types: in the first the episode is narrated visually with what we could call a textual structure—that is, with scenes that play the role of prologue, main subject and epilogue. [3] Paramount example by the two brilliant masters of narrativity, Michael Astrapas and Eutychios, is the splendid composition of the Dormition of the Virgin on the west wall of the Peribleptos in Ochrid (1295) (Figure 1). [4] The angel’s announcement of the death of the Theotokos and the sharing out of her garments to poor women are the introductory events, the representation of the Dormition is the central subject, and the burial of the Virgin is the epilogue. The same textual structure of the narration is encountered also in smaller iconographic formats, such as the sub-cycles that compose the Passion cycle [5] or, more specifically, the story of the Appearance of Christ on the Way to Emmaus. Prologue is the Journey to Emmaus, central subject the Supper, and epilogue Luke and Kleopas informing the apostles. [6] The second type of visual narration, on which I shall focus here, is the presentation of one event by illustrating several episodes, each of equal significance, which take place in successive moments in time. [7] In other words, these are different phases or moments of the same event. [8] Among the ideal expressions of this kind of narration is the composition of the Temptations of Christ, in the second bay of the exonarthex in the Chora monastery in Constantinople (1310/15). [9] The painter divided the surface of the domical vault down the middle, in order to accommodate two compositions: that of John Bearing Witness to Christ, in the north half, and that of the Temptations of Christ, in the south half. We can distinguish the two compositions because the painter has created a small gap between them, using architectural and natural elements of them as separator (Figure 2).

Figure 1.
Figure 2.
As has been ascertained from the extant examples of the Temptations, the Chora composition is a unique creation. [10] Avant-garde and with many innovations in the iconography and the use of inscriptions, it is one of the most characteristic examples of narrativity and performativity, which raises the following three questions: What are the artistic and expressive means with which the painter turns the Gospel narrative into a theatrical performance? How do body language and facial expression illustrate the dialogues between Christ and Satan? To what extent did the views of the Patron of Chora, Theodore Metochites, contribute to the creation of this singular composition?
************

The major challenge for the Chora painter was to depict such a demanding composition on a single large surface with just two figures as protagonists, in contrast to the host of figures in the Koimesis representation in the Peribleptos. In Chora we have a theatrical duet between the Devil and Christ. The basic material for its successful rendering exists in the Gospel text, which conveys the dramatic atmosphere but is spare in description, placing emphasis on the dialogues, without entering into details about the emotional state of the protagonists. [11] The talented painter of Chora utilizes the text to the full, emphasizing the performativity of the figures, which he reproduces in different moments of the event. His intention of creating striking elements, in order to counterbalance the repetition of the figures, is achieved thanks to the superb setting which covers half the surface of the second domical vault. By employing the Gospel text as the basic scenario of the representation, the painter creates four episodes (Figure 3) for the three temptations that Christ receives from Satan, so differentiating the Chora composition from every preceding representation. [12]

Figure 3.
A basic trait of the performativity is the variety in the ways in which the figures move, gesticulate, and express their emotions in each episode. Sophisticated statement of the visual fullness and innovativeness in the conception of the composition is that motion conveys the psychological state and the different character and sentiments of the two protagonists. The repulsive figure of Satan moves (Figure 4) spasmodically, appears suddenly, and jumps out from different points in the rocky landscape. [13] His movement and his gestures are exaggerated, revealing, like his facial expression, the basic reason for his presence and his aim, as related in the Gospel text. Through provocation, deceit, and mockery, he tries hard to trap Christ. Dominant in the depictions of Satan is his obvious intention of bringing Christ into a state that he has energetically striven to avoid throughout his life. The Devil tries to tempt him into displaying his divine power, so submitting to his demands. The dark creature with his sharp features avoids facing Christ directly and confronting him on an equal footing. [14] He exploits the rocky and uneven terrain so as to change position continuously, overtly creating an atmosphere of lies and deceit, in which he attempts to lure Jesus. Satan’s theatrical pose, his disheveled hair, and the constantly changing gestures of his hands create a sense of unrest and nervousness, so as to enable him to snare Christ and break his resistance.

Figure 4.
To the contrary, the figure of Christ in all four depictions of him is distinguished generally by stability. In the first two episodes and the fourth, which correspond to the three temptations, Christ moves calmly and through his divine power deals serenely with the Devil’s provocations. The painter renders the more general feeling that he gains from the Gospel text and depicts Christ conversing and giving his stern answers, particularly to the first temptation. Although his expression denotes self-control and restraint in dealing with the temptations, obvious too is the irritation aroused by the derisive demeanor of his adversary. The escalation of emotion and the increasing tension are overt after the second temptation. In contrast to the immediately preceding depiction, Christ’s especially somber manner, which is accompanied by gestures revealing his exasperation and psychological disturbance (Figure 5), so that he almost chases Satan, are telling instances of performativity in depictions of Christ in Palaiologan painting. The juxtaposition of sentiments and movements is heightened by the treatment of the mountainous environment as a staged backdrop, which, as happens mainly in Palaiologan art, the painter adapts to the plot of the storytelling, so as to achieve a dramatic effect. [15]

Figure 5.
Although the influence of the Gospel text in the representation is also apparent from the inscriptions, which will be discussed at the end of the paper, evident too is the artistic personality of the Chora painter, who as exponent of the major trend of the period for narrativity and theatricality, through the treatment of the figures, goes far beyond the text. He brings the figures to life, intimating their character and personality. The painter transfers the basic spiritual content of the Gospel narrative to Christ’s clash with Satan, which he shows through motion and expression. The body language and the emotional state, as imprinted in the faces, in reality transfer to the church a kind of theatrical performance which the believer could live and experience fully.
Narrativity as detailed rendering of the text with images, and performativity as interpretation of the text and the protagonists of the scenes, considerably reduced the distance between the beholder and the depicted, leading the believer into a profound relationship with the sacred story. Furthermore, the painters of the Palaiologan period do not confine themselves only to depicting motion and emotion, but handle their subject with a theatrical perception, which is clear in the overall artistic treatment even of fleeting details. Study of Palaiologan painting reveals the painters’ great experience in matters of composition and of individualized projection of personalities and characters. There are several examples of this, such as the representation from the cycle of the Post-Resurrection Appearances of Christ in the church of St George at Staro Nagoričino, which was decorated by the virtuosos of narrativity, Michael Astrapas and Eutychios, in 1316–1317. The consummate theatricality of the scene is apparent in the episode where Peter is asking Christ a question, while simultaneously pointing to John, and Christ, who although walking ahead, is turning his head back to answer Peter, as John and the rest of the disciples look on. Peter’s facial expression and gestures convey his curiosity, John’s belie his embarrassment, and Christ’s suggest his severe reply, part of which is written in the inscription. [16] All these, in combination with the poses and positions of the protagonists, attest the painter’s inspired staging of the narrative ensemble. [17] Despite the profusion of visual elements conveying performativity, the composition in Staro Nagoričino is distinguished by balance, harmony, and semantic fullness. The two highly accomplished painters, with this representation and through many others of analogous style, iconography, and performativity, create, like the painter in Chora, staged transferences of the text to the wall-paintings. They endow their figures with the traditional solemnity, which they enrich with elements of theatricality, clearly imparting a more secular conception to the painting of the period.

Returning to our composition, after the second temptation, the dialogue between Christ and Satan is interrupted and the inscription that follows changes style and content. From the dialogue we pass to the narration of the Gospel story. Τhe text of the inscription above the third episode (Figure 5) and the figure of Christ, which copies the Gospel text, is presented by an external narrator.

Τότε παραλαμβάνει / αὐτ(ὸν) ὁ διάβολος εἰς τ(ὴ) ἁγίαν πόλιν
Then the devil taketh him up into the holy city [18]

This inscription demonstrates the contribution of the Gospel text as primary source not only for depicting the four episodes, but also for the theatricality of the composition as a whole. However, we should ask whether the Gospel text was sufficient for the creation of this remarkable composition. Without doubt the painter was capable of turning text into image and of creating a splendid composition with all the traits noted above. The painter’s handling of the text, the figures, and the landscape create a unique composition.

In Chora, the natural landscape and the buildings are placed as if in a stage set, not only playing the role of backdrop but also participating in the action of the protagonists, thus contributing to the development of the narrative. The inhospitable stony desert, where the endurance and resistance of even the Son of God are put to the test, becomes the ideal locus of the eternal conflict between Good and Evil, with the tormented Christ repelling the provocative Satan, who leaps out from between the rocks. Τhe theatrical character of the visual narrative is continued until the end of the composition, with the wonderful setting in the last episode relieving the dramatic tension.

Figure 6.
In the scene of the Third Temptation, Christ declares his victory over Satan’s temptations by stepping firmly upon the temple of Solomon (Figure 6). [19] This episode functions again in theatrical terms, as it restores a sense of mental calm and redemption, so relieving the anxiety of the viewer. In Chora, as in many other Palaiologan examples, the depiction of the physical or architectural background of the scenes is clearly more developed in comparison to Middle Byzantine compositions, which are distinguished in general by a simpler approach. [20] The treatment of the background in the composition of the Temptations is far removed from any concept of abstract or illusionistic space. [21] On the contrary, it does not merely follow the Gospel text but enhances it, with the painter handling the background in such a way as to present the protagonists of the plot as if on a theatrical stage. The scenic structure shows to advantage the character and the intentions of the actors, contributing to the unfolding of the story and the transmitting of its messages to the beholder. [22] The struggle in the rocky landscape captures the fiendish work of the Devil and arouses a feeling of anxiety, whereas the triumph of Christ, at the pinnacle of the architectural form of the nave, expresses the triumph of divinity, bringing relief and joy because it gives the message of salvation. Consequently, the backdrop, where supernatural forces conflict, takes on the metaphysical character of the Gospel narrative, and this is another example of the biblical significance of theatricality in Palaiologan art. [23] In Chora, like the figures, the background on the one hand presents the historical elements of the narrative, and on the other the symbolic messages that the desert and the building offer. [24]
In addition to the figures, the architectural and the natural setting, the important role of the inscriptions in the theatricality of the composition should also be noted. They are an integral part of this narrative ensemble and exceptionally interesting because of their polymorphism, their position within the composition, and the diverse narrative manners with which the Gospel story is told. [25] The inscriptions in the composition do not present the episodes with brief titles, as is the case in most scenes, but narrate the story in two different ways. The theatricality of the composition becomes even more overt with the first narrative type of the inscriptions which comment on the representation of the Temptations. This is the dialogical type. We have here pairs of texts giving Christ’s dialogue with Satan, according to the Gospel of Matthew. It is very interesting that Satan’s temptations are the inscriptions written on the gray color of the rock and that Christ’s responses are the inscriptions on the gold ground. The contrast between the bright gold and the dark ground in the mosaic of the Temptations alludes to the opposition between the spirituality of the divine light and the demonic darkness of Satan’s words, in accordance with the writings of Chora’s patron, Theodore Metochites.
The composition of the Temptations in its final form also carries the stamp of the patron of Chora, Theodore Metochites, who collaborates with the painter so that the patron’s views are imprinted not only in the composition of the Temptations but in the entire iconographic program, as I have shown elsewhere. [26] Metochites’ contribution to the enrichment of the composition is decisive, and the patron emphasizes a more philosophical approach to the eternal struggle between Good and Evil. This universal clash is a favorite theme in Metochites’ literary works, namely his poems and his treatise: Ἠθικòς ἤ Περὶ Παιδείας (Moral Treatise or On Education). [27] His first poem begins with a prolix prayer to God in which he describes in epic terms the struggle between Good and Evil, caused by the devilish forces whose aim is to destroy the material and spiritual gifts of God to Mankind. [28] Divine power and divine wisdom are victorious over the forces of darkness:

O most powerful, only begotten Son of the great God, ruling on high, eternal light of the world … However, all these were taken from us because of the envy of mischievous Satan who fell from the place of light to deep darkness because of his insolence … As a result we became the laughing-stock of the evil one … O wicked fortune, get ye hence, envious Satan, go to hell. Our true Lord God, who is goodness itself, from whom all good things, all gifts are perfect come to mankind, has made me [Metochites] most prominent in the theatre of this life. [29]

Satan’s actions, which are manifested in human life sometimes in the form of illness of the body and spiritual death, sometimes by the envy that leads man to destruction and his condemnation to Hell, the kingdom of darkness, are dominant subjects throughout Metochites’ literary oeuvre. [30] In order to describe this great adventure of human existence, the patron of Chora dramatizes his poetry, but at the end there is always the certainty of the defeat of the daemonic forces, due to the divine majesty of the Almighty, which leads to salvation. Indeed, the motif of devilish energy in man and the redemption offered by Christ becomes at once central theme and characteristic denouement in many of Metochites’ poems:

Really, the former splendid imperial palace is now all dark, like the dreadful palace of Hades; nobody can live in it anymore, it is a horrible spectacle to look upon. ˂Now the royal palace is transformed into˃ a house of groaning and dreadful wailing … Tears and dark shivering are ˂to be seen˃ there instead …Βut O almighty Lord, O incomprehensible Wisdom of your Father, the eternal God, the creator of all things, visible and invisible … save me as well, overlooking my numerous sins from all this conflict, from all the cruel attacks of the arrows. [31]

This dynamic presence and apparent dominance of Satan, as presented in the Chora composition, can be correlated with Metochites’ Moral Treatise, in which he argues that, notwithstanding the preeminence of Evil, in the end it is Good that prevails in society:

In the case of what is good and bad, however, although evil is always much more prominent in life than goodness, still the latter always survives and, as one would expect, it has never until now failed in its battle against the rivaling multitude of evil. This is of course a significant testimony, I believe, to the power of goodness. [32]

In conclusion, we should point out mainly the maturing in monumental painting, around the mid-thirteenth century, of the artistic means and above all the painters’ desire to enhance narrativity in the most performative manner. The course of painting in the preceding centuries had prepared the way for this performativity, through the visual narration, and the painters sought through their art to attain the climax in presenting the figures in motion and with pluralistic facial expression by evolving and surpassing the Middle Byzantine stereotype of sorrow and pain. Research should not underestimate the fact that the Gospel text and the painters’ talent were the two principal reasons for achieving theatricality in the Palaiologan period. Other factors that possibly favored the performative presentation, such as the drama or the rhetorical discourse in aristocratic salons, [33] function circumstantially and in combination with the education of the patron or the spiritual creator of the program and do not constitute the basic reason for the theatricality.

Emotion and expressionism, motion and body language in general, together with elements from the staged backdrop, are the dominant expressive means through which the mode of the linear temporal succession of episodes is developed during the Palaiologan period. The extensive use of expressive means for the individualized projection of the personalities and characters of the narration is a significant and seminal artistic talent of the Chora painter. The protagonists are repeated at each moment, so that the Gospel text keeps its temporal sequence and the development of the plot that unfolds in the space and in the eyes of the congregants in the church, with the figures represented as if cinematographic actors. Palaiologan theatricality in monumental painting includes all the previous developments and offers a new and holistic dramaturgy in which all the figures depicted participated against a backdrop that is anything but abstract or neutral but that contributes to the telling of the story. To this creation, which is undoubtedly of the painters, in some cases the patrons of the churches contribute too, provided they have the education, to organizing the iconographic program as well as the iconography of specific subjects. In Chora the painter together with Metochites stage the representation of the Temptations, with the latter most probably collaborating so as to achieve the fullest possible dramatization of the composition. This is surmised from his singular personal and authorial approach to and interpretation of the temptations in his own life and the salvation that he seeks with the triumphal victory of Christ over Evil.

Bibliography

Demus, O. 1988. The Mosaics of San Marco in Venice. Vol 1, Text-Plates. Chicago.
Foskolou, A. V. 2019. “Telling Stories with Pictures: Narrative in Middle and Late Byzantine Monumental Painting.” Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 43(2):194–218.
Hjort, O. 2005. “‘Oddities’ and ‘Refinements’: Aspects of Architecture, Space and Narrative in the Mosaics of Kariye Camii.” In Interaction and Isolation in Late Byzantine Culture, ed. J. O. Rosenqvist, 27–43. London.
Jerphanion, G. de. 1925–1942. Une nouvelle province de l’art byzantin: Les églises rupestres de Cappadoce. 5 vols. Paris.
Jevtić, I. 2013. “Narrative Mode in Late Byzantine Paining: Questions it Raises about Sacred Images.” In Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art. Papers from the Third Annual International Symposium in Art History and Theory of Art, ed. S. V. Maltseva and E. Y. Stanyukovich-Denisova, 195–200. St. Petersburg.
Karahan, A. 2010. Byzantine Holy Images: Transcendence and Immanence: The Theological Background of the Iconography and Aesthetics of the Chora Church. Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 176. Leuven.
Maguire, H. 1977. “The Depiction of Sorrow in Middle Byzantine Art.” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 31:123–174.
———. 1981. Art and Eloquence in Byzantium. Princeton.
———. 1995. “Two Modes of Narration in Byzantine Art.” In Byzantine East, Latin West: Art-Historical Studies in Memory of Kurt Weitzmann, ed. C. Moss and K. Kiefer, 385–391. Princeton.
———. 1996. Τhe Icons of their Bodies. Saints and their Images in Byzantium, Princeton.
Μiljković-Pepek, P. 1967. Deloto na zografite Mihailo I Eutihij. Skopje.
Nelson, R. S. 1999. “Taxation with Representation: Visual Narrative and the Political Field of the Kariye Camii.” Art History 22.1:56–82.
Ousterhout, R. 1995. “The Virgin of the Chora: An Image and Its Context.” In The Sacred Image East and West, ed. R. Ousterhout and L. Brubaker, 91–109. Urbana-Champaign.
———. 2002. The Art of the Kariye Camii. London.
Polemis, I. 2002. Ἠθικ ò ς Περὶ παιδείας. Athens.
———. 2017. “Η φωνή της εξουσίας: η δομή της αφήγησης στα ποιήματα του Θεόδωρου Μετοχίτη.” Parekbolai 7:115–133.
Polemis, I., and E. Kaltsogianni. 2019. Theodorus Metochites Orationes, [Oration 10, Ἠθικὸς ἢ περὶ παιδείας]. Berlin.
Saranti, H. 2009. “Ο χώρος στη βυζαντινή σκέψη.” In Η αρχιτεκτονική ως εικόνα. Πρόσληψη και αναπαράσταση της αρχιτεκτονικής στη βυζαντινή τέχνη, ed. E. Chatzjitryphonos and S. Ćur
ić, 98–131. Thessaloniki.
Smyrlis, K. 2022. “Contextualizing Theodore Metochites and his Refoundation of the Chora.” REB 80:69–111.
Underwood, P. Α. 1966–1975. The Kariye Djami. 4 vols. New York.
———. 1975. “Some Problems in Programs and Iconography of Ministry Cycle.” In The Kariye Djami vol. 4, Studies in the Art of the Kariye Djami and Its Intellectual Background, 243–301. Princeton.
Vasilakeris, A. 2014. “Theatricality of Byzantine Images: Some Preliminary Thoughts.” In Medieval and Early Modern Performances in the Eastern Mediterranean, ed. A. Öztürken and E. Birg, 385–398. Turnhout.
Velmans, T. 1964. “Le role du décor architectural et la representation de l’espace dans la peinture des Paléologues.” Cahiers Archaeologique 14:183–216.
Weitzmann, K. 1970. Illustrations in Roll and Codex. Princeton.
Wharton-Epstein, A. 1986. Tokali Kilise. Tenth-Century Metropolitan Art in Byzantine Cappadocia. Dumbarton Oaks Studies 22. Washington, DC.
Xenophontos, S. 2020. Theodore Metochites, On Morals, or, Concerning Education. Cambridge, MA.
Zarras, N. 2010. “The Passion Cycle in Staro Nagoričino.” Jahrbuch der Österreichische Byzantinistik 60:181–213.
———. 2011. O εικονογραφικός κύκλος των εωθινών ευαγγελίων στην παλαιολόγεια μνημειακή ζωγραφική των Βαλκανίων. Thessaloniki.
———. 2016. “Narrating the Sacred Story: New Testament Cycles in Middle and Late Byzantine Church Decoration.” In The New Testament in Byzantium, ed. D. Krueger and R. S. Nelson, 239–275. Washington, DC.
———. 2021. “Illness and Healing: Τhe Ministry Cycle in the Chora Monastery and the Literary Oeuvre of Theodore Metochites.” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 75:85–119.

Footnotes

[ back ] * I express my warmest thanks to my friend and colleague Dr. Niki Tsironi for the invitation to participate in the Congress.
[ back ] 1. The humanization of the Gospel story is an ongoing development in Byzantine painting and is already apparent in the Middle Byzantine period. See Maguire 1981, esp. 91.
[ back ] 2. Elements of theatricality in Palaiologan painting have been pointed out by Maguire 1996:173–176.
[ back ] 3. Zarras 2010:181–213, esp. 202–205; Zarras 2016:239–275; Jevtić 2013:195–199.
[ back ] 4. In the Peribleptos the textual structure of the narration can be seen fully organized for the first time in monumental painting. Henceforth, the painters Michael Astrapas and Eutychios were to continue the narrative structure in all the monuments they decorated, leaving behind excellent examples of narrativity, notable among which are the cycles of Passion and of the Appearances of Christ after his Resurrection. On the Dormition in the Panagia Peribleptos, see Μiljković-Pepek 1967:fig. 38, 40, pl. XXI. See also Jevtić 2013:196.
[ back ] 5. The view that the storytelling of the painted cycles in the Palaiologan period has the same narrative structure as the vernacular romances (Foskolou 2019:208–209), especially for the Passion cycle, is very general and without specific examples it cannot be demonstrated that the influence of the romances is stronger than that of the linear mode of the gospel pericopes.
[ back ] 6. Characteristic example is the composition in Gračanica (1319–1320). See Zarras 2011:183–185, fig. 69.
[ back ] 7. This mode of narration was a basic iconographic formula in illuminated manuscripts. See Weitzmann 1970.
[ back ] 8. In the Palaiologan period this is a quite widely diffused depiction of sequential episodes of the same event, happening at the same moment in time. An important example is the composition of the Interrogation of Christ in prison, by Pontius Pilate, in the monastery of King Marko near Skopje (1374–1375), which is represented as a dialogue between the two protagonists. See Zarras 2016:264–265, figs. 11.13–11.14. In some cases, due to lack of space, the successive phases are depicted within the same scene, as in the Prayer of Christ in Gethsemane, in the Peribleptos at Ochrid, where the different dramatic hours the Lord lived through prior to his arrest are represented. See Μiljković-Pepek 1967, fig. 33, pls XXX, LX. On this type of narrativity see also, Jevtić 2013:196–197.
[ back ] 9. Τhe renovation of Chora coincides with the promotion of Metochites to the rank of Megas Logothetes (Prime Minister) as the inscription in the patronal portrait indicates. On the Temptation composition, see Underwood 1966–1967, 1:114–117; 2:pls. 216, 222–227; Ousterhout 2002:58–59; Zarras 2021:94–98, fig. 5. On a new date of the Chora renovation by Metochites see recently, Smyrlis 2022:69–111.
[ back ] 10. Underwood 1975:277–282.
[ back ] 11. Matt. (4:1–11) and Luke (4:1–13) mention the three Temptations and are the two basic sources, whereas Mark (1:12–13) gives a brief summary of the event, without citing any dialogue.
[ back ] 12. Three episodes are depicted at Saint Angelo in Formis and at San Marco in Venice, while one episode is depicted in the Tokali kilise, to confine myself to the most important examples. See de Jerphanion 1925–1942: I, 335, II, pls. 77.2, 81.4; Wharton-Epstein 1986:24, fig. 70. See also Underwood 1975:277–279, figs. 13–16.
[ back ] 13. The figure of Satan in Chora resembles that at Tokali. See Wharton-Epstein 1986:24.
[ back ] 14. On the contrary, in the church of San Marco the figures of Christ and Satan are depicted in dialogue, the one opposite the other. The strict symmetry characteristic in general of the representation in the Venice basilica is totally alien to the organization of the composition in Chora. See Demus 1988: pls. 103, 107–110; Underwood 1975:279–280, fig. 16.
[ back ] 15. On the usage of architectural background in Middle and Late Byzantine representations, see Vasilakeris 2014:385–398.
[ back ] 16. The phrase is preserved in the badly damaged inscription in old Slavonic: See Zarras 2011:274, fig. 156.
[ back ] 17. On the scene, see Zarras 2011:273–277, 298–299; Zarras 2016:271–272, fig. 11.20.
[ back ] 18. Underwood 1966–1967:115; Zarras 2021:97–98.
[ back ] 19. The image of Christ upon Solomon’s temple is depicted also in San Marco. See Demus 1988, 1, pls. 103, 108.
[ back ] 20. Velmans 1964:183–216, esp. 183. See also Vasilakeris 2014:386–387; Foskolou 2019:212n58.
[ back ] 21. In contrast to other examples in which the background is not realistic or as has been characterized as fantastical. See Velmans 1964:198–200, 202, 205–216; Jevtić 2013:197.
[ back ] 22. On the role of the background in Chora see also, Hjort 2005:27–43.
[ back ] 23. For other examples from the Middle Byzantine period, see Maguire 1977:161; Maguire 1995:385–391.
[ back ] 24. Saranti 2009: 98–131, esp. 116–119.
[ back ] 25. On the inscription of the Temptation composition, see Underwood 1966–1967:114–115.
[ back ] 26. Zarras 2021:85–86, 117–118. On Metochites’ influence on the iconographic program of Chora see also, Ousterhout 1995:91–109; Nelson 1999:56–82.
[ back ] 27. Metochites’ early poems, which make up the first group (poems 1–10), are dated to shortly after the restoration of Chora. The Moral Treatise is dated around 1305. See Polemis 2002:9. See also Zarras 2021:96–97.
[ back ] 28. Polemis 2017:115–133, esp. 120–121.
[ back ] 29. Polemis 2017: 47, 55, 59. Cf. Zarras 2021:95–96.
[ back ] 30. Similar subjects in theological thought are discussed in Karahan 2010.
[ back ] 31. Polemis 2017:180, 243–244. In another poem he states: “But have mercy on us once more, do not forget your own nature, remember those celebrated, indescribable miracles are praised proofs of your love for mankind: through your formidable interventions you saved men from great, various dangers many times in the past and you gave a new life to those who had been dead, bringing them forcefully out of Hades and the kingdom of darkness, freeing them from their fetters … O my good Lord … O eternal fountain of mercy … grant us happiness after these disasters; change the situation for the better, your hand being indeed so generous.” Polemis 2017:271, 273.
[ back ] 32. Polemis and Kaltsogianni 2019: [Oration 10, Ἠθικὸς ἢ περὶ παιδείας] 14.3–5; Translation in: S. Xenophontos 2020:33.
[ back ] 33. The influence of these factors on the performative character of narrativity remains a topic under question. See Foskolou 2019:194–218, esp. 217–218.